In this action to foreclose a mortgage, the Supreme Court properly denied the borrower's cross motion for leave to renew that branch of his motion which was to dismiss the complaint as against him, since the borrower failed to demonstrate that there had been a change in the law that would have altered the prior determination, pursuant to CPLR 2221[e][2].
Citimortgage, Inc. v. Warsi, NY Slip Op 00074 (2d Dep't January 11, 2023)
