New York courts have recognized that it is imperative to the nature of the judicial function that judges be free to make decisions without fear of retribution through accusations of malicious wrongdoing. Recognizing the distinct nature of the judicial process, judicial immunity protects judges only in the performance of their judicial functions. A logical extension of this premise is that other neutrally positioned government officials, regardless of title, who are delegated judicial or quasi-judicial functions should also not be shackled with the fear of civil retribution for their acts. The common law provides absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons, governmental or otherwise, who are integral parts of the judicial process.
Marrero v. State of New York, NY Slip Op 07294 (2d Dep't December 24, 2025)
