The article 78 court providently exercised its discretion in declining to grant leave to renew, as petitioner raised no new facts that would have changed the outcome of the prior order and judgment, and did not provide a reasonable excuse for failing to present those facts with the petition, pursuant to CPLR 2221[e].
Yu Chan Li v. New York City Landmarks Preserv. Commn., NY Slip Op 02281 (1st Dep't April 16, 2020)
Here is the decision.
