A motion for summary judgment may not be made before issue is joined and the requirement is strictly adhered to.
Brooklyn Bound Realty Corp. v. Charles, NY Slip Op 03174 (2d Dep't May 28, 2025)
A motion for summary judgment may not be made before issue is joined and the requirement is strictly adhered to.
Brooklyn Bound Realty Corp. v. Charles, NY Slip Op 03174 (2d Dep't May 28, 2025)
Under CPLR 3211(a)(1), a dismissal is warranted only if the documentary evidence utterly refutes plaintiff's factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law. Affidavits, emails, and letters are not considered documentary evidence within the meaning of CPLR 3211(a)(1).
Bernstein v. Jacobson, NY Slip Op 03173 (2d Dep't May 28, 2025)
The single motion rule does not bar a defendant from moving to dismiss the new claim asserted in the amended complaint.
Zaiger, LLC v. Bucher Law, PLLC, NY Slip Op 03268 (1st Dep't May 29, 2025)
Any purported error in the service of the amended pleading upon was not jurisdictional in nature and, in the absence of any apparent prejudice to the defendant, can and should be ignored by the court, pursuant to CPLR 3012[a].
399 Broadway Holdings, LLC v. Das, NY Slip Op 03172 (2d Dep't May 28, 2025)
An action to foreclose a mortgage is governed by a six-year statute of limitations, pursuant to CPLR 213[4]. Even if a mortgage is payable in installments, once a mortgage debt is accelerated, the entire amount is due and the statute of limitations begins to run on the entire debt. Acceleration occurs by the commencement of a foreclosure action wherein the holder of the note elects in the complaint to call due the entire amount secured by the mortgage.
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Sylvestre, NY Slip Op 03039 (2d Dep't May 21, 2025)
Expectation damages is the general measure of damages in a breach of contract case under New York law.
Telefonico S.A. v. Millicom Intl. Cellular S.A., NY Slip Op 03153 (1st Dep't May 22, 2025)
A defendant seeking to vacate a default and to compel the plaintiff to accept an untimely answer must show both a reasonable excuse for the default and the existence of a potentially meritorious defense. The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lies within the trial court's discretion.
Here, service was made by delivering copies of the summons and complaint to the Secretary of State, and evidence in admissible form from the defendant's affidavit established that the default was caused by the Secretary of State's delay in forwarding the copies of the summons and complaint to the defendants. The Secretary of State's delay in forwarding the papers is a reasonable excuse for the default.
BJ Integra Affordable, LLC v. Vanmew,Hous. Dev. Fund Corp., NY Slip Op 03035 (2d Dep't May 21, 2025)