Memorial Day

Memorial Weekend

Memorial Weekend

Memorial Weekend

Summary judgment.

A motion for summary judgment 'should not be granted where the facts are in dispute, where conflicting inferences may be drawn from the evidence, or where there are issues of credibility.

Smith-Joyner v. Barahona, NY Slip Op 02718 (2d Dep't May 18, 2024)

Here is the decision.

Forum selection clauses.

The documentary evidence conclusively demonstrates that plaintiff's employment contract with defendants contained a forum selection clause mandating that her action seeking unpaid commissions be brought in Connecticut. Plaintiff does not argue that the clause is unreasonable, unjust, or invalid because of fraud or overreaching. Instead, plaintiff argues that the forum selection clause is contained in a separate contract and, therefore, is inapplicable to her claim for unpaid commissions. That argument is to no effect. All parts of the employment contract were signed by the parties at the same time and involve the same subject matter, namely, the terms and conditions of plaintiff's employment. Thus, the forum selection clause is applicable to plaintiff's action seeking unpaid commissions pursuant to the New York Labor Law.

Kravitz v. Chicken Soup for the Soul, LLC, NY Slip Op 02664 (1st Dep't May 14, 2024)

Here is the decision.

Constructive fraud.

A claim for constructive fraud is governed by a six-year statute of limitations, and arises at the time the fraud or conveyance occurs, pursuant to CPLR 213[1].

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP v. Marcus & Cinelli LLP, NY Slip Op 02670 (1st Dep't May 14, 2024)

Here is the decision.

Service of process.

At a hearing on the validity of service of process, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving personal jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. In reviewing a determination made after a hearing, the Appellate Division's authority is as broad as that of the hearing court, and it may render the determination it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account that, in a close case, the hearing court had the advantage of seeing the witnesses.

Bohensky v. 1670 42nd St., LLC, NY Slip Op 02682 (2d Dep't May 15, 2024)

Here is the decision.

Premises liability.

A property owner will not be held liable for injuries sustained from a condition on the property which is inherent or incidental to the nature of the property and which could reasonably be anticipated by those using it. Here, the plaintiff fell in an area of a municipal park which was characterized by reed beds and which was not intended to be a public walkway. The County established, prima facie, that the condition that caused the plaintiff's fall was incidental to the nature of the property and could reasonably have been anticipated in that location.  In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the discovery allegedly provided by the County after the summary judgment motion was fully submitted did not require denial of the summary judgment motion, as the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the facts contained in that discovery were relevant or exclusively within the knowledge and control of the County. 

Claus v. County of Nassau, NY Slip Op 02518 (2d Dep't May 8, 2024)

Here is the decision.

Attorneys' fees.

The decision to award attorneys' fees and the determination as to their reasonableness lies within the sound discretion of the trial court. The attorney bears the burden of establishing the reasonable value of the services rendered, based on a showing of the hours reasonably expended and the prevailing hourly rate for similar legal work in the community. The court should consider factors such as (1) the time and labor required, the difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill required to handle the problems presented; (2) the lawyer's experience, ability, and reputation; (3) the amount involved and benefit resulting to the client from the services; (4) the customary fee charged for similar services; (5) the contingency or certainty of compensation; (6) the results obtained; and (7) the responsibility involved.

Neeman v. Smith, NY Slip Op 02541 (2d Dep't May 8, 2024)

Here is the decision.

Appellate practice.

 It is the appellant's obligation to assemble a proper record on appeal. The record on appeal must contain all of the relevant papers before the Supreme Court. An appeals that is not based on a complete and proper record must be dismissed.

Here, the record failed to include the exhibits allegedly demonstrating that the plaintiff's former counsel was involved in a fraud scheme. Furthermore, the record does not contain a copy of the complaint, the amended complaint, or the defendant's answer. Since these omissions have rendered meaningful appellate review of the court's order virtually impossible, the appeal must be dismissed 

Bing v. Myrtle 6, LLC, NY Slip Op 02516 (2d Dep't May 8, 2024)

Here is the decision.