"Quid est veritas?"

Spy Wednesday.

The trimmed lamps.

The fig tree.

The procession with palms.

A dismissed defamation claim.

The statements are not actionable where the plaintiff fails to set forth the exact words complained of, and the time, place, and manner of the purported defamation.

Offor v. Mercy Med. Ctr., NY Slip Op 02663 (1st Dep't April 9, 2019)

Here is the decision.

Statutes of limitations.

Parties may contract for shorter limitations periods than those provided by statute, as long as the contractual limitations period is reasonable and in writing.

Jonas v. National Life Ins. Co., NY Slip Op 02662 (1st Dep't April 9, 2019)

Here is the decision.

1970.

CPLR 5701(a)(2).

No appeal lies from that portion of the trial court's order declining to sign a specific paragraph in an order to show cause.

Sitbon-Robson v. Robson, NY Slip Op 02625 (1st Dep't April 4, 2019)

Here is the decision.

CPLR 2221.

A subsequent motion that does not present any facts that had not been raised in the prior motion is effectively a motion for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable.

Clampa Org., LLC v. Vergara, NY Slip Op 02495 (2d Dep't April 3, 2019)

Here is the decision.

A time-barred defamation claim.

The one-year statute of limitations, pursuant to CPLR 215(3), generally accrues on the date of the first publication of the allegedly defamatory statement. A reference to an article that does not restate the defamatory material is not a republication of the material.

Biro v. Conde Nast, NY Slip Op 02615 (1st Dep't April 4, 2019)

Here is the decision.