Real Estate Law.

Practice point: There is no liability for a seller's failing to disclose information, in an arms length transaction, absent active concealment of a defective condition.

Students should note that even proof of active concealment is ineffective if the buyer should have known of the defect.

Case: Laxer v. Edelman, NY Slip Opinion 06159 (2d Dept. 2010)

Here is the opinion.

Tomorrow's issue: Motion practice.

Property.

Practice point: The possession of land without any claim of right, no matter how long it may be continued, gives no title.

Students should note that reliance on the doctrine of "practical location" requires proof of a clear demarcation of a boundary line.

Case: Estate of Becker v. Murtagh, NY Slip Op 06157 (2d Dept. 2010)

Here is the opinion.

Tomorrow's issue: Real Estate Law.

Motion practice.

Practice point: On a party's death, the court no longer has jurisdiction to conduct proceedings, and the action is stayed as to decedent pending substitution of a legal representative.

Students should note that any determination rendered absent that substitution is a nullity, pursuant to CPLR 1015, 1021.

Case: Stancu v. Oh, NY Slip 05754 (2d Dept. 2010)

Here is the opinion.

Monday’s issue: Property.

Torts.

Practice point: A libel action must allege statements of fact, not opinion.

Students should note that an opinion statement is not actionable even if it is accompanied by a recitation of facts on which it is based.

Case: Halstead v. Strauss, NY Slip Op 05731 (2d Dept. 2010)

Here is the opinion.

Tomorrow’s issue: Motion practice.

Motion practice.

Practice point: A motion to dismiss based on CPLR 3211(a)(1) requires documentary evidence refuting plaintiff's factual allegations, establishing a defense as a matter of law.

Students should note that to be considered documentary, evidence must be unambiguous and of undisputed authenticity.

Case: Springer v. Almontaser, NY Slip Op 06081 (2d Dept. 2010)

Here is the opinion.

Tomorrow's issue: Torts.

Labor Law.

Practice point: A separate prime contractor is not liable under for injuries to the employees of other contractors where there is no privity of contract.

Students should note, however that where that contractor has been delegated authority to supervise and control the work, the contractor becomes a statutory agent of the owner or general contractor.

Case: Barrios v. City of New York, NY Slip Op 06072 (2d Dept. 2010)

Here is the opinion.

Tomorrow's issue: Motion practice.

Motion practice.

Practice point: A defendant looking to amend the answer to allege a counterclaim is not required to submit evidentiary proof.

Students should note that the tort of trade libel or injurious falsehood requires the knowing publication of false and derogatory statements calculated to prevent others from dealing with the plaintiff

Case: Banco Popular N. Am. v. Lieberman, NY Slip Op 06067 (1st Dept. 2010)

Here is the opinion.

Tomorrow's issue: Labor Law.

Landlord-Tenant Law.

Practice point: To establish constructive eviction, a tenant must prove wrongful acts that deprived him of the beneficial use and enjoyment of the premises.

Students should note that partial actual eviction requires that the tenant be physically prevented from using a portion of the premises

Case: Pacific Coast Silks, LLC v. 247 Realty, LLC, NY Slip Op 05887 (1st Dept. 2010)

Here is the opinion.

Monday's issue: Motion practice.

Practice point: At a fact-finding hearing in an abuse and/or neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the standard is a preponderance of the evidence.

Students should note that there is a religious exemption from the Public Health Law's immunization requirements, pursuant to Public Health Law § 2164(9)

Case:Matter of Isaac J., NY Slip Op 05997 (2d Dept. 2010)

Here is the opinion.

Tomorrow's issue: Landlord-Tenant Law.

Motion practice.

Practice point: There is no cause of action sounding in deceptive acts and practices, pursuant to General Business Law § 349, arising from a private contractual dispute.

Students should note that there is no cause of action for unjust enrichment if there is a valid agreement.

Case: Merin v. Precinct Developers, LLC, NY Slip Op 05691 (1st Dept. 2010)

Here is the opinion.

Tomorrow's issue: Family Law.

Motion practice.

Practice point: A certificate of acknowledgement attached to an instrument such as a deed raises a rebuttable presumption of due execution.

Students should note that if a deposition transcript is not sent to the deponent for review, pursuant to CPLR 3116(a), the transcript is inadmissible at trial.

Case: Moffett v. Gerardi, NY Slip Op 05990 (2d Dept. 2010)

Here is the opinion.

Tomorrow's issue: Motion practice.