A party seeking to pierce the corporate veil must establish that (1) the owners exercised complete domination of the corporation with respect to the transaction attacked, and (2) the domination was used to commit a fraud or wrong against the plaintiff which resulted in the plaintiff's injury. As a general rule, a claim for alter ego liability is fact-laden and not well-suited for summary judgment.
Arjumand v. LaGuardia Express, LLC, NY Slip Op 04117 (2d Dep't June 30, 2021)
