Practice point: The fundamental rule of contract interpretation is that
agreements are construed in accord with the parties' intent, and the best
evidence of their intention is what they say in
their writing.
Student note: Thus, a written agreement that is clear and unambiguous on its
face must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms, and
extrinsic evidence of the parties' intent may be considered only if the
agreement is ambiguous.
Case:
Banco Espírito Santo, S.A. v.
Concessionária Do Rodoanel Oeste S.A., NY 06186 (1st Dept. 2012.
Here is the decision.
Tomorrow’s issue: A referee’s powers
and compensation.