May 9, 2012
The continuous treatment doctrine.
Practice point: A physician or hospital cannot escape liability under the doctrine merely because of a failure to make a correct diagnosis as to the underlying condition, where it treated the patient continuously over the relevant time period for symptoms that are ultimately traced to that condition.
Student note: The premise underlying the doctrine is that a plaintiff should not have to interrupt ongoing treatment to bring a lawsuit, because the doctor not only is in a position to identify and correct the malpractice, but also is best placed to do so.
Case: Chestnut v. Bobb-McKoy, NY Slip Op 03267 (1st Dept. 2012).
Here is the decision.
Tomorrow’s issue: Correcting a judgment.