Student note: New facts are required on a motion to renew, pursuant to CPLR 2221[e][2]).
Case: Rhodes v. City of New York, NY Slip Op 07569 (1st Dept. 2011).
Here is the decision.
Tomorrow’s issue: Discovery.
November 1, 2011
Summary judgment.
Practice point: An argument advanced for the first time in reply papers will not be considered in deciding the motion.
Student note: New facts are required on a motion to renew, pursuant to CPLR 2221[e][2]).
Case: Rhodes v. City of New York, NY Slip Op 07569 (1st Dept. 2011).
Here is the decision.
Tomorrow’s issue: Discovery.
Student note: New facts are required on a motion to renew, pursuant to CPLR 2221[e][2]).
Case: Rhodes v. City of New York, NY Slip Op 07569 (1st Dept. 2011).
Here is the decision.
Tomorrow’s issue: Discovery.
