April 9, 2008

CPLR 203(a)

Practice point: The mere filing of a motion for leave to amend the complaint to name an additional defendant is not itself the interposition of the claim, within the meaning of the statute, and the amended complaint must be timely served in order to have personal jurisdiction.

Case:Gomez v. City of New York, NY Slip Op 02764 (1st Dept. 2008)