Records which are attorney work product are specifically protected from disclosure. The records cannot be redacted under the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), which permits redactions of records only under the personal privacy exemption.
October 8, 2021
A nonjusticiable controversy under the First Amendment.
The Appellate Division affirmed dismissal of this action. Although the plaintiff contends that the $230,000 payment she made to defendants five years before the action was commenced should not be considered a tithe, the record shows that the payment was, in fact, a tithe, and that plaintiff made it voluntarily. The $230,000 check made out to the defendant stated "tithe" in the memo section. The issues of the plaintiff's motivation for tithing and the proper amount of the tithe necessarily implicate the interpretation of religious doctrine ,and cannot be resolved through the application of neutral principles of law.
Wilson v. Christ Alive Christian Ctr., NY Slip Op 05315 (1st Dep't October 5, 2021)
October 7, 2021
A cause of action for conversion.
The plaintiff must show (1) legal ownership or an immediate right of possession to tangible personal property or specific money, and (2) that the defendant exercised an unauthorized dominion over the thing in question to the exclusion of the plaintiff's right. There is conversion when funds designated for a particular purpose are used for an unauthorized purpose.
Alpha/Omega Concrete Corp. v. Ovation Risk Planners, Inc., NY Slip Op 05113 (2d Dep't September 29, 2021)
October 6, 2021
Appellate practice.
The appeal from the order which granted plaintiff's motion to proceed pseudonymously was dismissed. The death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to conduct proceedings in an action until a proper substitution has been made pursuant to CPLR 1015(a). While the parties need not renew their motions, proper substitution of a defendant must be made before the motion is decided. Since the order was issued after a defendant's death and without proper substitution, the Appellate Division does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine the appeal.
Thomas v. Rubin, NY Slip Op 05112 (1st Dep't September 28, 2021)
October 5, 2021
CPLR 3215(c).
October 4, 2021
CPLR 2214(b).
The defendant's opposition to the plaintiffs summary judgment motion was due to be served no later than seven days prior to the return date, but the defendant served his opposition six days after the return date. The Appellate Division determined that the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to consider the defendant's opposition, as the defendant failed to provide a valid excuse for the late service.
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. McEnery, NY Slip Op 05023 (2d Dep't September 22, 2021)
October 3, 2021
Service of process.
The plaintiff had the burden of proving that jurisdiction was obtained over the defendant by proper service of process. A process server's affidavit of service constitutes prima facie proof of service.
Chase Home Fin., LLC v. Kahana, NY Slip Op 05022 (2d Dep't September 22, 2021)
October 2, 2021
Summary judgment in a medical malpractice action.
A physician moving for summary judgment dismissing the complaint must establish, prima facie, either that there was no departure from accepted standards of medical care, or that any departure was not a proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries. On this showing, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to submit evidentiary facts or materials to rebut the defendant's prima facie showing, but only as to those elements on which the defendant met the prima facie burden.
G. M. C. v. O'Sullivan, NY Slip Op 05020 (2d Dep't September 22 2021)
October 1, 2021
Contractual indemnification in a personal injury action.
The party seeking contractual indemnification must prove itself free from negligence, because to the extent its negligence contributed to the accident, it cannot be indemnified therefor.
Barcliff v. Schindler El. Corp., NY Slip Op 05019 (2d Dep't September 22, 2021)
September 30, 2021
CPLR 3126(3).
A court may impose discovery sanctions, including the striking of a pleading, where a party "refuses to obey an order for disclosure or willfully fails to disclose information which the court finds ought to have been disclosed." The nature and degree of a statutory penalty for discovery violations is addressed to the court's discretion. While public policy strongly favors the resolution of actions on the merits, the court may resort to the drastic remedies of striking a pleading or precluding evidence upon a clear showing that a party's failure to comply with a disclosure order was the result of willful and contumacious conduct. The court can infer that a party is acting willfully and contumaciously through the party's repeated failure to adequately respond to discovery demands or to comply with discovery orders.
Ambroise v. Palmana Realty Corp., NY Slip Op 05018 (2d Dep't September 22, 2021)
September 29, 2021
Appellate practice.
Where the Appellate Division affirms the granting of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action, the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court for the entry of a judgment as to the declaration.
23A Vernon, LLC v. Oneal, NY Slip Op 05017 (2d Dep't September 22, 2021)