Court holiday.

The courts are closed today, and so there is no post on NEW YORK LAW NOTES.

Monday's issue is motion practice.

Motion practice.

Practice point: Plaintiff's expert's affidavit was rejected for non-compliance with the disclosure requirements of CPLR 3101(d)(1)(i) when the expert witness was first identified in opposition to defendant's summary judgment motion, after plaintiff filed the note of issue and certificate of readiness.

Students should note that the affidavit will also be rejected if the expert fails to demonstrate sufficient qualifications to render an opinion.

The case is Pellechia v. Partner Aviation Enters., Inc., NY Slip Op 00496 (2d Dept. 2011).

Here is the decision.

Monday's issue is motion practice.

Landlord-Tenant Law.

Practice point: The Housing Authority does not consider a deceased tenant’s godson an immediate relative who is able to obtain permanent permission to occupy an apartment and succeed to the lease.

Students should note that the Court has consistently enforced the agency's policy requiring a tenant to make a written request to have a relative or other family member become either a legally authorized permanent household member or a co-tenant.

The case is Hawthorne v. New York City Housing Authority, NY Slip Op 00569 (1st Dept. 2011).

Here is the decision.

Tomorrow's issue is motion practice.

Torts.

Practice point: Single-family residential property owners are exempt from statutory liability for personal injury caused by the failure to maintain the sidewalk abutting their property in a reasonably safe condition, pursuant to Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-210[b].

Students should note, however, that there may be common-law liability absent a showing that they did not affirmatively cause or create the alleged defect in the sidewalk.

The case is Gilmartin v. City of New York, NY Slip Op 00559 (1st Dept. 2011).

Here is the decision.

Tomorrow's issue is Landlord-Tenant Law.

Motion practice.

Practice point: Plaintiff established prima facie entitlement to a default judgment by submitting an affidavit of service, a copy of the verified complaint, and an attorney affirmation attesting to defendant’s default in answering.

Students should note that the motion was defeated by the submission of an affidavit stating that service was made on a non-employee, unauthorized to accept service on defendant's behalf, raising a fact issue as to his apparent authority to accept service.

The case is Miterko v. Peaslee, NY Slip Op 00492 (2d Dept. 2011).

Here is the decision.

Tomorrow's issue is Torts.

Trial practice.

Practice point: The parties may stipulate to the facts to be determined at trial, effectively excluding disputed matters that otherwise would be available to them.

Students should note that the parties stipulated to the only unresolved issues following trial, and since the stipulation did not reach the issue of disgorgement, plaintiff's belated request for that relief was denied.

The case is Dental Health Assoc. v. Zangeneh, NY Slip Op 00484 (2d Dept. 2011).

Here is the decision.

Monday's issue is motion practice.

Labor Law.

Practice point: The fact that an injured plaintiff was the sole witness to the accident does not preclude summary judgment.

Students should note that plaintiff established prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the § 240(1) cause of action by submitting an affidavit and deposition testimony demonstrating that the scaffold she was using collapsed, causing her to fall and sustain injuries. 

The case is Campbell v. 111 Chelsea Commerce, L.P., NY Slip Op 00482 (2d Dept. 2011).

Here is the decision. 

Tomorrow's issue is trial practice.

Vehicle and Traffic Law.

 Practice point: A driver with the right-of-way is entitled to anticipate that other drivers will yield as required, pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1128, 1143.

Students should note, however, that the driver with the right-of-way has the duty to maintain a proper lookout to avoid a collision.

The case is Bonilla v. Calabria, NY Slip Op 00481 (2d Dept. 2011).

Here is the decision.

Tomorrow's issue is Labor Law.

Contracts.

Practice point: Standing alone, a contractual obligation does not give rise to tort liability to a third party. 

Students should note, however, that a party contracting to render services may be liable to a third party if it negligently creates or exacerbates a dangerous condition.

The case is Bodenmiller v. Thermo Tech Combustion, Inc., NY Slip Op 00480 (2d Dept. 2011).

Here is the decision.

Tomorrow's issue is Vehicle and Traffic Law.

Trial practice.

Practice point: The apportionment of fault among defendants is generally an issue of fact for the jury.

Students should note that the jury's apportionment will not be set aside unless it could not have been reached based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence.

The case is McAleer v. Geraghty, NY Slip Op  00361 (2d Dept. 2011).

Here is the decision.

 Tomorrow’s issue is Contracts.

Labor Law.

Practice point: In order to prevail on a § 240(1) cause of action, plaintiff must establish that the statute was violated and that the violation was a proximate cause of the injury.

Students should note that summary judgment is precluded only if the disputed facts related to material issues.

Case: Leconte v. 80 E. End Owners Corp., NY Slip Op 00359 (2d Dept. 2011)

Here is the decision.

Monday’s issue: Trial practice.