Practice point: A school has a duty to supervise its students with the same degree of care as an ordinarily prudent parent in comparable circumstances.
Case: Doe v. Department of Education of the City of New York, NY Slip Op 06586 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
August 26, 2008
Motion practice.
Practice point: A motion to strike an answer, pursuant to CPLR 3126, will be denied if defendant did not have prior notice that this sanction was imminent.
Case: Sidelev v. Tsal-Tsalko, NY Slip Op 05750 (1st Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Case: Sidelev v. Tsal-Tsalko, NY Slip Op 05750 (1st Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
August 25, 2008
Dog bites.
Practice point: To recover in strict liability for a dog bite, a plaintiff must establish that the dog had vicious propensities and that the owner knew or should have known of them. Admissible evidence would include a prior attack; the dog's tendency to growl, snap, or bare its teeth; the way the dog was restrained; and the fact that the dog was kept as a guard dog.
Case: Grubb v. Healy, NY Slip Op 05044 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Case: Grubb v. Healy, NY Slip Op 05044 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
August 22, 2008
Motion practice.
Practice point: If a matter is stricken from the trial calendar and designated as inactive, but not dismissed, a plaintiff seeking to restore is not required to submit an affidavit of merit or an explanation as to why the case was removed from active status.
Case: Ross v. Brookdale Univ. Hosp. & Med. Ctr., NY Slip Op 06597 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Case: Ross v. Brookdale Univ. Hosp. & Med. Ctr., NY Slip Op 06597 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
August 21, 2008
Civil contempt.
Practice point: To sustain a determination of civil contempt, a court must find that the alleged contemnor violated the court’s lawful and express order, and that, as a result, a party to the litigation was prejudiced, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 753[A][3].
Case: Village of Plandome Manor v. Ioannou, NY Slip Op 06594 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Case: Village of Plandome Manor v. Ioannou, NY Slip Op 06594 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
August 20, 2008
Statute of limitations.
Practice point: The statute of limitations for tort actions against the MTA is one year and 30 days, pursuant to Public Authorities Law § 1276[1],[2]. For negligence actions against the Transit Authority, the statute is one year and 90 days, pursuant to Public Authorities Law § 1212[3].
Case: Sullivan v. Atlantic Paratransit of N.Y.C., Inc., NY Slip Op 05920 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Case: Sullivan v. Atlantic Paratransit of N.Y.C., Inc., NY Slip Op 05920 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
August 19, 2008
Quiet enjoyment.
Practice point: A plaintiff may properly plead a cause of action for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment by alleging a constructive eviction, namely, because the cooperative failed to make necessary repairs, the conditions in plaintiff’s home compelled plaintiff to move out.
Case: Granirer v. Bakery, Inc., NY Slip Op 06582 (1st Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Case: Granirer v. Bakery, Inc., NY Slip Op 06582 (1st Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
August 18, 2008
Summary judgment.
Practice point: A court may set the time within which a party may move for summary judgment, pursuant to CPLR 3212(a), through a so-ordered stipulation.
Case: Ford v. City of New York, NY Slip Op 06579 (1st Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Case: Ford v. City of New York, NY Slip Op 06579 (1st Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
August 15, 2008
August 14, 2008
Labor Law.
Practice point: A plaintiff’s failure to identify, in the Complaint or Bill of Particulars, an alleged Code violation is not necessarily fatal to a Labor Law § 241(6) cause of action.
Case: Galarraga v. City of New York, NY Slip Op 06545 (2d Dept. 2008)
Click here for the opinion.
Case: Galarraga v. City of New York, NY Slip Op 06545 (2d Dept. 2008)
Click here for the opinion.
August 13, 2008
Employment Law.
Practice point: In stating a claim of vicarious liability, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the employer had knowledge of, and acquiesced in or condoned, the discriminatory conduct. An employer’s failure to act is the same as affirmative conduct.
Case: Bianco v. Flushing Hospital Med. Ctr., NY Slip Op 06542 (2d Dept. 2008)
Click here for the opinion.
Case: Bianco v. Flushing Hospital Med. Ctr., NY Slip Op 06542 (2d Dept. 2008)
Click here for the opinion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)