Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying petitioner's motion for leave to renew, finding that the purportedly new facts would not have changed the judgment, pursuant to CPLR 2221[e][2]. The new information, which concerned whether respondents had relied on similar settlement agreements in other administrative proceedings, would not have altered the applicability of this settlement agreement to preclude judicial review.
383 W. Broadway Corp. v. Solomon, NY Slip Op 05741 (1st Dep't October 16, 2025)
