The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's cross-motion for leave to renew her opposition to those branches of the plaintiff's prior motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against her and for an order of reference, since the defendant failed to demonstrate that there had been a change in the law that would have altered the prior determination, pursuant to CPLR 2221[e].
Bank of Am. N.A. v. Bente, NY Slip Op 02304 (2d Dep't April 23, 2025)
