Even where a motion for reargument is untimely under CPLR 2221(d)(3), a court has discretion to reconsider its prior ruling.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Stern, NY Slip Op 03800 (2d Dep't June 25, 2025)
Even where a motion for reargument is untimely under CPLR 2221(d)(3), a court has discretion to reconsider its prior ruling.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Stern, NY Slip Op 03800 (2d Dep't June 25, 2025)
A temporary restraining order will not issue where the alleged injury is fully compensable in money damages.
Arena Ltd. SPV, LLC v. Chalets, LLC, NY Slip Op 03759 (1st Dep't June 24, 2025)
The right to contractual indemnification depends upon the specific language of the contract.
Collado v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J. (2d Dep't June 18, 2025)
The law of the case doctrine applies only to legal determinations that were necessarily resolved on the merits in a prior decision and to the same questions presented in the same case.
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Bruno, NY Slip Op 03706 (2d Dep't June 18, 2025)
A simple breach of contract may not be considered a tort absent the violation of a legal duty independent of the contract itself. Where the alleged damages were clearly within the contemplation of the written agreement, merely charging a breach of a duty of due care, employing the language of tort law, does not transform a simple breach of contract into a tort claim.
E.W. Howell Co., LLC v. Control Point Assoc., Inc., NY Slip 03708 (2d Dep't June 18, 2025)
As a general rule, banks do not owe non-customers a duty to protect them from the intentional torts of their customers.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Canova, NY Slip Op 03719 (2d Dep't June 18, 2025)
The general rule is that a corporation which acquires the assets of another is not liable for the torts of its predecessor. An exception to the rule is the de facto merger doctrine in which the corporation is shorn of its assets and becomes, in essence, a shell. Legal dissolution is not necessary in order to invoke the doctrine.
One River Run Acquisition, LLC v. Milde, NY Slip Op 03653 (1st Dep't June 17, 2025)
In a negligence action, a plaintiff moving for summary judgment on the issue of liability must establish, prima facie, that the defendant breached a duty owed to the plaintiff and that the defendant's negligence was a proximate cause of the alleged injuries. The plaintiff does not have the burden of establishing the absence of his own comparative negligence. However, the issue of the plaintiff's comparative negligence may be decided on summary judgment where the plaintiff seeks dismissal of an affirmative defense alleging comparative negligence.
Jean-Pierre v. Wang Chiang Ho, NY Slip Op 03709 (2d Dep't June 18, 2025)
The report of a referee should be confirmed whenever the findings are substantially supported by the record and the referee has clearly defined the issues and resolved matters of credibility. The referee's findings and recommendations are advisory only and have no binding effect on the court, which remains the ultimate arbiter of the dispute.
Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB. v. Blick, NY Slip Op 03601 (2d Dep't June 11, 2025)
The motion to dismiss the complaint as abandoned under CPLR 3215(c) is untimely when it is made after the entry of a judgment of foreclosure and sale.
HSBC Bank USA v. Amponsah, NY Slip Op 03631 (1st Dep't June 12, 2025)