An untimely filing.

The City's submission of its answer two days after the stipulated deadline does not require entry of default against it. The City demonstrated its intent to oppose the petition on the merits by requesting petitioner's agreement to the extension and subsequently filing an answer, and petitioner does not argue that the brief delay prejudiced him.

Matter of Kuza v. New York City Dept. of Fin., NY Slip Op 07297 (1st Dep't December 22, 2022)

Here is the decision.

The doctrine of equitable estoppel.

Invocation of the doctrine requires a showing of deception, fraud, or misrepresentation. The plaintiff cannot invoke the doctrine to prevent the defendant from asserting a statute of limitations defense based on an oral promise to pay the funds at issue in this breach of contract action.

Angeli v. Barket, NY Slip Op 07213 (2d Dep't December 21 2022)

Here is the decision.

An alleged breach of fiduciary duty.

There is no fiduciary relationship where the contracting parties were engaged in an arms' length transaction, as it is a purely business relationship.

National Auditing Servs. & Consulting, LLC v. 511 Prop., LLC, NY Slip Op 07300 (1st Dep't December 22, 2022)

Here is the decision.

Sua sponte dismissal.

Plaintiff's motion to vacate the court's sua sponte dismissal is granted. The motion appended an agreement between the parties to vacate the dismissal. In addition, plaintiff's counsel explained that he failed to file the discovery stipulation as the motion court directed in its notices as he expected the outstanding discovery issues to be handled at an upcoming conference. The outstanding issues to be raised at the conference related to discovery was that owed by defendants, not plaintiff. Finally, the record shows no evidence that plaintiff was dilatory at any time during discovery. 

Avagyan v. 100 W. 74th St., LLC, NY Slip Op 07291 (1st Dep't December 22, 2022)

Here is the decision.

Appellate practice.

In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial, the Appellate Division's power is as broad as that of the trial court. As a result, the Appellate Division may render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account that, in a close case, the trial court had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses.

21st Mtge. Corp. v. Nodumehlezi, NY Slip Op 07212 (2d Dep't December 21, 2022)

Here is the decision.

Court holiday.

A judgment of foreclosure and sale.

Plaintiff established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by submitting copies of the original note, mortgage, and loan modification, and evidence of the borrower's default in payment. Defendant failed to raise an issue of fact, as the unrecorded discharge of mortgage upon which defendant relies does not insulate a subsequent purchaser from prior claims, when the existence of such claims was apparent from the face of the record. If defendant had reviewed the public record, as required, it would have found that the purported discharge of mortgage had never been entered or recorded and that the original mortgage was still recorded.

US Bank NA v. 532 W. 187 LLC, NY Slip Op 07211 (1st Dep't December 20, 2022)

Here is the decision.

Spoliation of evidence.

A party seeking a sanction for spoliation must demonstrate that the party with control over the evidence had an obligation to preserve it at the time it was destroyed; that the evidence was destroyed with a culpable state of mind; and that the destroyed evidence was relevant to the party's position such that the trier of fact could find that the evidence would support the claim or defense. 

Blackstock v. AVR Crossroads, LLC, NY Slip Op 07179 (1st Dep't December 20, 2022)

Here is the decision.