Practice point: In order for assets to become part of a trust, pursuant to EPTL 7-1.18, the grantor must actually transfer the assets.
Students should note that the mere recital of assignment, holding or receipt is insufficient for transferring the assets.
Case: Matter of Bishop v. Maurer, NY Slip Op 03840 (1st Dept. 2010)
The opinion is here.
Tomorrow's issue: Contracts.
May 19, 2010
Torts.
Practice point: Failure to read the owner's manual severs the causal connection between an alleged failure to warn and the accident.
Students should note that a manufacturer who sells a product in a defective condition is liable for injuries resulting from its intended use or from its unintended but reasonably foreseeable use.
Case: Reis v. Volvo Cars of North America, Inc., NY Slip Op 03779 (2d Dept. 2010)
The opinion is here.
Tomorrow's issue: Trusts and Estates.
Students should note that a manufacturer who sells a product in a defective condition is liable for injuries resulting from its intended use or from its unintended but reasonably foreseeable use.
Case: Reis v. Volvo Cars of North America, Inc., NY Slip Op 03779 (2d Dept. 2010)
The opinion is here.
Tomorrow's issue: Trusts and Estates.
May 18, 2010
Family Law.
Practice point: A spousal agreement that is fair on its face will be enforced according to its terms unless there is proof of fraud, duress, overreaching, or unconscionability.
Students should note that the agreement will not be overturned merely because some of its provisions were one-sided, and simply alleging an unequal division of assets does not establish unconscionability.
Case: Cioffi-Petrakis v. Petrakis, NY Slip Op 03266 (2d Dept. 2010)
Here is the opinion.
Tomorrow's issue: Torts.
Students should note that the agreement will not be overturned merely because some of its provisions were one-sided, and simply alleging an unequal division of assets does not establish unconscionability.
Case: Cioffi-Petrakis v. Petrakis, NY Slip Op 03266 (2d Dept. 2010)
Here is the opinion.
Tomorrow's issue: Torts.
May 17, 2010
School Law.
Practice point: Schools are not liable for every thoughtless or careless act by one pupil might injure another.
Students should note that there likely is no liability for an injury caused by an impulsive, unanticipated act, absent prior conduct that would have put a reasonable person on notice to protect.
Case: Armellino v.Thomase, NY Slip Op 03256 (2d Dept. 2010)
The opinion is here.
Tomorrow's issue: Family Law.
Students should note that there likely is no liability for an injury caused by an impulsive, unanticipated act, absent prior conduct that would have put a reasonable person on notice to protect.
Case: Armellino v.Thomase, NY Slip Op 03256 (2d Dept. 2010)
The opinion is here.
Tomorrow's issue: Family Law.
May 14, 2010
Motion practice.
Practice point: A cause of action sounding in conversion requires a showing of ownership or a superior right of possession, and of defendant's exercise of dominion, to the exclusion of plaintiff's rights.
Students should note that to recover on an alleged personal guarantee, pursuant to General Obligations Law § 5-701(a)(2), there must be a subscribed writing promising to answer for the debt or default.
Case: Schwartz v. Sayah, NY Slip Op 03103 (2d Dept. 2010)
Here is the opinion.
Monday's issue: School Law.
Students should note that to recover on an alleged personal guarantee, pursuant to General Obligations Law § 5-701(a)(2), there must be a subscribed writing promising to answer for the debt or default.
Case: Schwartz v. Sayah, NY Slip Op 03103 (2d Dept. 2010)
Here is the opinion.
Monday's issue: School Law.
May 13, 2010
Motion practice.
Practice point: In a legal malpractice action, an attorney's affirmation may suffice as expert opinion as to the adequacy of professional services.
Students should note that to succeed on a motion to dismiss, defendant must establish that plaintiff cannot prove at least one essential element of the cause of action.
Case: Scartozzi v. Potruch, NY Slip Op 03102 (2d Dept. 2010)
The opinion is here.
Tomorrow's issue: Motion practice.
Students should note that to succeed on a motion to dismiss, defendant must establish that plaintiff cannot prove at least one essential element of the cause of action.
Case: Scartozzi v. Potruch, NY Slip Op 03102 (2d Dept. 2010)
The opinion is here.
Tomorrow's issue: Motion practice.
May 12, 2010
Motion practice.
Practice point: A certification order warning that dismissal will result from failure to file a note of issue within 90 days is of the same effect as a 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216.
Students should note that plaintiff must either timely file or move to extend the time.
Case: Polizzi v. Burke, NY Slip Op 03096 (2d Dept. 2010)
The opinion is here .
Tomorrow's issue: Motion practice.
Students should note that plaintiff must either timely file or move to extend the time.
Case: Polizzi v. Burke, NY Slip Op 03096 (2d Dept. 2010)
The opinion is here .
Tomorrow's issue: Motion practice.
May 11, 2010
Motion practice.
Practice point: An Article 78 proceeding is summary in nature, and so a summary judgment motion going to the petition's merit is unnecessary.
Students should note that, pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75(3), an employee may be suspended without pay for a period of not more than thirty days, pending a hearing on a charge of incompetency or misconduct.
Tomorrow's issue: Motion practice.
May 10, 2010
Corporations.
Practice point: Directors and officers, in the performance of their duties, have a fiduciary relationship to the corporation, and owe the corporation their undivided loyalty.
Students should note that, without consent, an officer or director may not divert and exploit for personal benefit an opportunity that should be deemed an asset of the corporation.
Case: Morales v. Galeazzi , NY Slip Op 03086 (2d Dept. 2010 )
Tomorrow's issue: Motion practice.
May 7, 2010
Municipalities Law.
Practice point: A municipality is obligated to keep the streets in a reasonably safe condition for travel.
Students should note that, under the storm in progress rule, the City generally is not liable for injuries resulting from slippery conditions that occur during an ongoing storm, or for a reasonable time thereafter.
Case: Mazzella v. City of New York , NY Slip Op 03078 (2d Dept. 2010
Monday's issue: Corporations.
May 6, 2010
Corporations.
Practice point: The compulsory redemption requirement of Business Corporation Law § 1510 does not extend to a shareholder's involuntary termination of employment from a professional corporation.
Students should note that public policy will be determined by reference to statutes and legal precedents, and not from a consideration of supposed public interests.
Case: Lubov v. Horing & Welikson, P.C., NY Slip Op 03076 (2d Dept. 2010 )
Tomorrow's issue: Municipalities Law.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)