Practice point: Judiciary Law § 474 sets forth the general rule, namely, that compensation is governed by the attorney-client agreement, express or implied, which is otherwise not restrained by law.
Practitioners should note that, pursuant to CPLR 1207, if the action involves an infant, a judicially-declared incompetent or a conservatee, a court must approve the attorneys’ fees which are specified in a settlement.
Case: White v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., NY Slip Op 09592 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Tomorrow's issue: Constructive notice.
December 26, 2008
Privileged communications.
Practice point: A qualified privilege extends to a communication on a subject in which both persons have an interest.
Practitioners should note that the qualified privilege is defeated where a plaintiff can demonstrate that defendant’s communication was not made in good faith but was motivated solely by malice.
Case: Phelan v. Huntington Tri-Village Little League, Inc., NY Slip Op 09576 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Monday's issue: Attorneys' fees.
Practitioners should note that the qualified privilege is defeated where a plaintiff can demonstrate that defendant’s communication was not made in good faith but was motivated solely by malice.
Case: Phelan v. Huntington Tri-Village Little League, Inc., NY Slip Op 09576 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Monday's issue: Attorneys' fees.
December 25, 2008
Merry Christmas.
Courts are closed because of the Christmas holiday and so there is no post today. Thank you for your support throughout the year and best wishes for a blessed Christmas season.
Courts reopen tomorrow and there will be a new post.
Tomorrow's issue: Privileged communications.
Courts reopen tomorrow and there will be a new post.
Tomorrow's issue: Privileged communications.
December 24, 2008
Personal jurisdiction.
Practice point: Failure to serve process leaves the court without personal jurisdiction over a defendant, and all subsequent proceedings are thereby rendered null and void.
Practitioners should note that, pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4), a default judgment must be vacated once a movant demonstrates the lack of personal jurisdiction.
Case: Hossain v. Fab Cab Corp., NY Slip Op 09561 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Practitioners should note that, pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4), a default judgment must be vacated once a movant demonstrates the lack of personal jurisdiction.
Case: Hossain v. Fab Cab Corp., NY Slip Op 09561 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Personal jurisdiction.
Practice point: Failure to serve process leaves the court without personal jurisdiction over a defendant, and all subsequent proceedings are thereby rendered null and void.
Practitioners should note that, pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4), a default judgment must be vacated once a movant demonstrates lack of personal jurisdiction.
Case: Hossain v. Fab Cab Corp., NY Slip Op 09561 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Practitioners should note that, pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4), a default judgment must be vacated once a movant demonstrates lack of personal jurisdiction.
Case: Hossain v. Fab Cab Corp., NY Slip Op 09561 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
December 23, 2008
Labor Law.
Practice point: Painting is a covered activity, pursuant to § 240(1), and, in order to be actionable, it need not be incidental to other specified activities such as construction, repair or alteration.
Practitioners should note that, by itself, a fall from a ladder is insufficient to impose statutory liability. There must be evidence that the ladder was defective or inadequately secured and that the defect, or the failure to secure the ladder, was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff's injuries.
Case: Artoglou v. Gene Scappy Realty Corp., NY Slip Op 09542 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Practitioners should note that, by itself, a fall from a ladder is insufficient to impose statutory liability. There must be evidence that the ladder was defective or inadequately secured and that the defect, or the failure to secure the ladder, was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff's injuries.
Case: Artoglou v. Gene Scappy Realty Corp., NY Slip Op 09542 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
December 22, 2008
Equitable estoppel.
Practice point: To estop the assertion of a statute of limitations defense, plaintiff must establish by clear and convincing evidence that the action was not timely commenced because of defendant’s fraud, deception or misrepresentation.
Practitioners should note that the statute will not be tolled when plaintiff failed to plead either fraud or fraudulent concealment, but only alleged medical malpractice based on defendant's failure to appreciate the information contained in a radiology report.
Case: Bayuk v. Gilbert, NY Slip Op 09460 (1st Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Practitioners should note that the statute will not be tolled when plaintiff failed to plead either fraud or fraudulent concealment, but only alleged medical malpractice based on defendant's failure to appreciate the information contained in a radiology report.
Case: Bayuk v. Gilbert, NY Slip Op 09460 (1st Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
December 19, 2008
Corporations.
Practice point: A corporation must appear by an attorney, pursuant to CPLR 321(a).
Practitioners should note that, to avoid the statutory requirement, the corporation may assign its claims to an appropriate individual plaintiff.
Case: Kinlay v. Henley, NY Slip Op 09450 (1st Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Practitioners should note that, to avoid the statutory requirement, the corporation may assign its claims to an appropriate individual plaintiff.
Case: Kinlay v. Henley, NY Slip Op 09450 (1st Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
December 18, 2008
Negligence.
Practice point: Deposition testimony that the floor on which plaintiff slipped was "very shiny" and "overwaxed," without more, does not support an inference of negligent waxing or polishing.
Practitioners should note that no inference of negligence can be drawn from the fact that, after plaintiff fell, a carpet and a warning sign were placed on the floor.
Case: Purcell v. York Bldg. Maintenance Corp., NY Slip Op 09439 (1st Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Practitioners should note that no inference of negligence can be drawn from the fact that, after plaintiff fell, a carpet and a warning sign were placed on the floor.
Case: Purcell v. York Bldg. Maintenance Corp., NY Slip Op 09439 (1st Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
December 17, 2008
Right of way.
Practice point: A driver facing a red flashing light must stop before entering the intersection, pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1113(a), and then proceed according to the rules applicable after stopping at a stop sign. A driver who fails to yield the right-of-way after stopping at a stop sign is in violation of § 1142(a), and is negligent as a matter of law.
Practitioners should note that a driver with the right-of-way is entitled to anticipate that others will obey the applicable traffic laws and yield the right-of-way.
Case: Melendez v. County of Nassau, NY Slip Op 09367 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Practitioners should note that a driver with the right-of-way is entitled to anticipate that others will obey the applicable traffic laws and yield the right-of-way.
Case: Melendez v. County of Nassau, NY Slip Op 09367 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
December 16, 2008
Trivial defects.
Practice point: Injuries resulting from trivial defects are not actionable.
Practitioners should note that there is no 'minimal dimension test' or per se rule that, in order to be actionable, a defect must be of a certain height or depth. Instead, a court will consider the width, depth, elevation, irregularity and appearance of the defect, along with the time, place and circumstance of the injury.
Case: Berry v. Rocking Horse Ranch Corp., NY Slip Op 09342 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Practitioners should note that there is no 'minimal dimension test' or per se rule that, in order to be actionable, a defect must be of a certain height or depth. Instead, a court will consider the width, depth, elevation, irregularity and appearance of the defect, along with the time, place and circumstance of the injury.
Case: Berry v. Rocking Horse Ranch Corp., NY Slip Op 09342 (2d Dept. 2008)
The opinion is here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)